Leech Therapy, Thrombophlebitis and Varicose Veins |
|
Thrombophlebitis and Varicose Veins Before the advent of heparin, leech therapy was an established method for acute treatment of deep leg vein thrombosis and superficial thrombophlebitis. Many older nurses and doctors from different departments remember using leeches to treat such cases. With the arrival of heparin, which was before the age of randomized controlled studies, leech therapy quickly lost much of its former significance, but it has still retained significance as a niche application for treatment of symptomatic varicosis and superficial thrombophlebitis in medical practice. A multitude of case studies and case series on this subject can be found in the older internal medicine literature. Bottenberg's book on leech therapy was an authoritative work of the times. Indian researchers used technology-based methods for objective classification of the effects of leech therapy in a more recent uncontrolled clinical trial in 20 patients with venous ulcers in patients with complicated varicose veins. A single leech application reportedly led to a significant anti-edematous effect in 19 out of 20 patients and produced healing of the previously refractory venous ulcers in all patients studied. Because of the lack of a control group, it is not possible to determine whether the effect of leech therapy was a specific effect. There are no other uncontrolled or controlled studies on this subject. As in many other diseases, years of successful traditional practice provide a broad base of empirical evidence of efficacy, but only little evidence that fulfils the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Controlled studies must therefore be performed in order to obtain a more specific efficacy assessment. Since leech therapy does not have cosmetic effects on varicose veins and because effective physical methods for edema treatment are available, these studies should concentrate on the efficacy of leeching in alleviating the symptoms of varicose veins and in healing venous ulcers. However, these studies cannot be conducted without financial support. Sufficient research funding is crucial for achieving scientific proof of the efficacy of leech therapy. A. Michalsen |
Venous Disease; Varicose Veins
Venous
disease is one of the best-established traditional indications for
leech therapy. There is a plethora of case reports and empirical studies
on the subject, including clinical
investigations of the efficacy of leeching for
postoperative prevention of thrombosis before the advent of heparin,
which is now the standard
prophylactic agent. The postoperative use of leeches
for prevention of thrombosis was proposed by the French surgeon Termier
as far back as the 1920s. His recommendation was first adopted in France
and was later implemented successfully in numerous hospitals around the
world. In addition to its fibrinolytic and viscosity-enhancing effects
in the blood, leeching also has
bactericidal and some spasmolytic activity that may
have a very positive effect on the patient's general condition. Leeching
was therefore a permanent
institution at many hospitals for many years and was
readily performed even though it was relatively time-consuming in terms
of changing the dressing and
caring for the animals. In
the end, comparative studies from this period were unable to demonstrate that
leech therapy could reliably prevent thromboembolism. This was
presumably due to the unreliable pharmacokinetics and poorly
controllable anticoagulatory effects of leeching. After the advent of heparin,
leeching rapidly lost its foothold
in thrombosis prophylaxis and is no longer used
for this indication today. In deep vein thrombosis, the systemic effects
of leeches are insufficient;
hence, it must be assumed that they do not have
any relevant systemic fibrinolytic activity. In modern medicine, the use
of leeches for adjuvant treatment
of acute deep leg vein thrombosis cannot be
justified because the established drugs used for initial anticoagulation
constitute a contraindication for leeching. In
venous disease, medicinal leech therapy can be recommended for treatment of
acute superficial phlebitis and chronic venous insufficiency (CVI)
associated with varicose veins and postthrombotic symptom complex. Leech
therapy is particularly useful for symptomatic treatment of varicose
veins. Although it cannot
eliminate the venous dilatation and valvular insufficiency
of varicosis, leeching is valued as a tool for quickly alleviating the
symptoms associated with the
disease. In most cases, the symptoms of swelling, pain,
and perceived heaviness in the region of varicose veins or perivenous
tissues improve significantly
after leech application. We must stress that, when
used to treat symptomatic varicosis, leech therapy should be
administered in combination with
other effective treatment modalities, especially those for relief of venous congestion. Important pillars of chronic
venous insufficiency management include weight normalization for obese
patients, physical therapy, and Kneipp's system of hydrotherapy. For optimal
treatment results, supportive
measures (e.g., support or compression stockings and
medicinal wraps) should be continued and/or incorporated into combined
treatment strategies. In any case, the patient should always be advised
that leech therapy improves the symptoms but not the appearance of
varicose veins. Spider-burst
must be differentiated from symptomatic varicose veins.
Most patients seeking treatment for this mainly asymptomatic form of
venous dilatation are women
expecting cosmetic improvement. Leech therapy can,
in fact, improve the cosmetic appearance of spider-burst veins, but
there are no reliable data for objective quantification of the
treatment results. As with CVI, it
is important to inform patients with spider-burst veins that leeching
often does not change the appearance of their condition and that the
leech bites can even result in
small scars or depigmentation. In
most cases, leech application has a significantly positive effect on the
course of superficial phlebitis. Patients often perceive a noticeable
improvement of symptoms right after treatment. Due to the potent
anti-inflamma-tory, blood-thinning, and lymph flow-accelerating effect of leech
secretions, the symptoms of
swelling and pain rapidly subside, and the local letting of
blood has a decongesting effect in the affected region. In
acute phlebitis, our experience has shown that the application of a larger
number of leeches in a single session achieves the best results. In chronic
venous disease, on the other hand, it is better to apply a smaller
number of leeches in a series of
treatments. Practical
Procedure Target
sites for leech application must be identified while the patient is
standing to ensure that the blood vessels are in their maximum filling
state. Leeches should never be
applied to a visible or palpable vein, but always
perivenously, that is, slightly proximal or lateral to the vein. Once
the target sites have been identified, the leeches can be applied while
the patient is lying down. As soon
as the bleeding has stopped and dark crusts have formed, cooling compresses should be applied to the leech bites. We
have found curd or lemon wraps to
be effective for this purpose; these supportive measures enhance the results of treatment and reduce and/or eliminate
the itching and swelling that
often occur following treatment. The patient should l<eep the leg elevated during the first two days after treatment.
The leech therapist should
specifically advise the patient never to scratch on or around the leech
bites since this could cause inflammation and permanent depigmentation
of the bite marks. The
"dosage" guidelines provided below should be interpreted as reference
values that must be adjusted to the individual needs of each patient.
Based on our experience in practice, we also recommend that leeching
should not be performed on patients with venous diseases on hot days
unless absolutely necessary. Acute
Phlebitis, Acute Superficial Thrombosis Six
to ten closely spaced leeches are applied perivenously. Leeching should
be performed two to three times within a period of approximately one
weel< until the symptoms have subsided completely. Blood counts
should be obtained before any repeat treatments are administered. Postthrombotic
Syndrome Secondary to Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis Leeches
can be applied to the affected region for superficial adjuvant therapy
(only after completion of pharmacological anticoagulant therapy! ).
Repeat treatments can be
considered if the initial treatment resulted in good improvement of symptoms
and prolonged therapeutic effects. To avoid problems with wound healing,
leeches should never be applied directly to regions with marked signs of
dermatitis or ulceration. Chronic
Venous Insufficiency The
symptoms of CVI (e.g., feeling of heaviness, pain, swelling, and itching in
the legs) typically occur after orthostatic stress. The severity of
symptoms, not the cosmetic
appearance, determines the need for treatment. Four
to six leeches are evenly distributed lateral to the affected veins.
The treatment should be repeated at four- to six-week intervals, i.e.,
after the therapeutic effect
subsides. In the case of severe varicosis in the thigh
and calf regions, it may be necessary to apply more leeches (10-12)
around the vein in order to cover
the symptomatic region adequately. Blood counts
should be obtained prior to bilateral or repeat leech applications. Special
recommendations apply when treating venous ulcers in the calf
and forefoot region associated with severe CVI. We advise against
applying leeches directly to the
ulcers, even though good results have reportedly been
achieved with this practice in isolated cases. Instead, we recommend
that a few leeches be applied to
the healthy skin roughly 2-10 cm proximal and
lateral to the edges of the ulcer wounds. Spider-Burst
Veins The number of leeches used depends on the extent of venous dilatation. As a rule, no more than four to five leeches are required for a focal area of spider-burst veins. The leeches can be applied directly in and around the spider-burst region.
P. Flecken, A. Michalsen |
||
|
Index |
|||